The challenge
The prompt text wasn't kept, and the challenge files weren't re-read for this write-up. What the records do show:
- New "language": Terraform HCL. The question IDs use
polyglot-terraform_hcl-…, and the solver's flagged list namesterraform_hclbenign-utility and downloader values. - Single Solve: 1,703 questions (1,571 in the core batch, then 132 by the plug-ins). That is 44 more than Day 27's 1,659, the same step Day 27's four Dockerfiles × 11 fields made; today's files weren't listed.
- Time Trial: new specimen fields with a six-hex stem,
polyglot-terraform_hcl-e61285-{file-path,url-host,path-leaf,campaign-token}:
| Field (suffix) | Example from the Time Trial | Format |
|---|---|---|
- |
4abdb311 |
exact text |
- |
terraform_ |
exact text |
-, - |
not recorded | exact text |
The timed question counts and the Mastery's set count weren't recorded.
Reading the prompt: what it said we'd need
| Clue | What it pointed to | What I did about it |
|---|---|---|
terraform- (challenge ID) |
Terraform files describing cloud resources, plus some ordering of events | Nothing new was needed: the solver core's generic plan reader covers any polyglot- file, as it covered Elixir, Erlang, and Dockerfile on Days 25–27 |
| "Out of Order" (title) | Steps or stages listed out of sequence; reading the true order | The core sends each file's own ordered step graph from its plan, so the order came from the file, not from appearance |
terraform_ values on the flagged list |
Values (none, T1105) rejected on other questions before |
Sent anyway, as designed; all accepted |
Safety
Static analysis only. Nothing was executed. The solver's core reads each script as text and decodes its analysis plan in Python; no Terraform, cloud CLI, or other interpreter is started. For this write-up only our own records of the day were read; no challenge file was opened. Indicators below are defanged.
What was in the files
- Single Solve: Day 27's scripts plus today's Terraform HCL specimens, 1,703 questions in all. The archive size and member list weren't recorded.
- Time Trial: new values in specimen fields keyed by a hex stem (
e61285), for example campaign token4abdb311and hostterraform_hcl-4abdb311de[.]example[.]invalid. - Mastery: CORRECT; its set count and size weren't recorded.
Single Solve
The solver solved it in two batches, with no stop. Its core answered 1,571 questions; the reply was accepted with 132 remaining, which the plug-ins then sent merged.
It flagged 62 values it had seen rejected on other questions before (none, T1105, T1059.007, linear, among them the terraform_hcl benign-utility and downloader ones) and sent them anyway, as designed; none was rejected. That is the same count as Day 27.
deadline none (Single Solve)
answers 1,571 core (accepted, remaining 132), then 132 plug-in answers
result CORRECT (09:01:04.9)
The Single flag isn't shown: the solver's report doesn't print it.
Report quirk, as on Day 27: the timings the solver's report printed under its "Single Solve: CORRECT" line are the Time Trial's, and the next block is the Mastery's. The figures below are assigned to the right modes.
Time Trial
CORRECT on the first attempt, ranked.
answers includes polyglot-terraform_hcl-e61285-{file-path,url-host,path-leaf,campaign-token}
start 1741 ms
artifact 322 ms
solve 93 ms
submit 1088 ms
TOTAL 3247 ms (submit +1,777 ms after started_at)
result CORRECT flag 17e05ea4…6593 (09:01:13.4)
The start took 1.7 s, over half the total; Day 27's was 0.8 s.
Mastery
CORRECT on the first attempt, ranked.
start 1718 ms
artifact 753 ms
solve 1056 ms
submit 1848 ms
TOTAL 5412 ms (submit +4,595 ms after started_at)
result CORRECT flag 4d524435…f0e2 (09:01:23.6)
Time to solve
All three modes were solved by 09:01:23.6 ET, 1 min 23.6 s after release, each on the first submit; the Single Solve was CORRECT at 09:01:04.9 and both timed modes were ranked (+1.78 s and +4.60 s after their started_at). Script was one of two lanes the solver finished on its own that day.
Takeaways
- A generic plan reader keeps paying, a fourth day running. Terraform HCL needed no code, as Elixir, Erlang, and Dockerfile needed none on Days 25–27.
- Per-file reading answers "out of order". Whatever the title's ordering trap was, the core reads each file's own ordered steps and never carries a value between files, so it cost nothing.
- The flagged-values list is a warning, not a veto. All 62 flagged values were accepted again.
- The start request is now the slow part of the Time Trial. 1.7 s to start against 93 ms to solve. Worth watching if it repeats.
- The solver's report still mislabels its Single block. Two days running, the "Single Solve" timings were the Time Trial's, and the Single flag wasn't printed.